Public Officials Under God
By E. J. Dionne Jr.
Tuesday, February 28, 2006; Washington Post, A15
When John F. Kennedy
ran for president in 1960, he said some things about Catholic bishops
that might, in today's climate, be condemned as insolence toward
church authority.
"I believe in an
America where the separation of church and state is absolute --
where no Catholic prelate would tell the president (should he be
Catholic) how to act," Kennedy told the Greater Houston Ministerial
Association in September 1960. "I do not speak for my church
on public matters -- and the church does not speak for me."
Kennedy, of course, spoke
those words in an effort to fight anti-Catholic bigotry. That was
long before the 2004 campaign, in which John F. Kerry, only the
third Roman Catholic in American history to be nominated for the
presidency by a major party, found himself fending off certain prelates
who said that his stand on abortion meant he could not receive communion
-- and also meant that Catholics should not vote for him.
The episode caused anger,
anguish and reflection among Democratic politicians who are Catholic.
"People felt their faith was being questioned, and they were
angry that ideologues were using the church for their own purpose,"
said Rep. Rosa DeLauro of Connecticut.
Such reflections have
produced a remarkable document that will be released this week,
a "Statement of Principles By Fifty-Five Catholic Democrats
in the U.S. House of Representatives." It is, to the best of
my knowledge, an unprecedented attempt by a large number of elected
officials to explain the relationship between their religious faith
and their public commitments.
"As Catholic Democrats
in Congress," the statement begins, "we are proud to be
part of the living Catholic tradition -- a tradition that promotes
the common good, expresses a consistent moral framework for life
and highlights the need to provide a collective safety net to those
individuals in society who are most in need. As legislators, in
the U.S. House of Representatives, we work every day to advance
respect for life and the dignity of every human being. We believe
that government has moral purpose."
The statement is only
six paragraphs, which gives it clarity and focus. After a paragraph
on Catholic social teaching about the obligations to "the poor
and disadvantaged," the writers get to the hard issue, insisting
that "each of us is committed to reducing the number of unwanted
pregnancies and creating an environment with policies that encourage
pregnancies to be carried to term."
What's significant is
that this is not a statement from pro-choice Catholics trying to
"reframe" the abortion question. The signatories include
some of the staunchest opponents of abortion in the House, including
Reps. Bart Stupak, Dale Kildee, Tim Holden, James Oberstar and James
Langevin.
In other words, Democrats
on both sides of the abortion question worry that it is crowding
out all other concerns. And in very polite language, the Catholic
Democrats suggest that their bishops allow them some room to disagree.
"In all these issues, we seek the church's guidance and assistance
but believe also in the primacy of conscience," they write
in an echo of Kennedy. "In recognizing the church's role in
providing moral leadership, we acknowledge and accept the tension
that comes from being in disagreement with the church in some areas."
With any luck, this statement
will provoke two debates, one outside the Catholic Church and one
inside.
One of the troubling
aspects of 2004 was the extent to which partisan politics invaded
the churches and seemed to enlist them as part of the Republicans'
electoral apparatus. But there is a difference between defending
the legitimate right of churches to speak up on public questions
and the hyperpoliticization of the church itself.
For Catholics with moderate
or liberal leanings, the argument from some bishops that they could
vote only for staunch foes of abortion posed a wretched dilemma.
It seemed to demand that such voters cast their ballots for conservative
or right-wing candidates with whom they might disagree on every
other question -- social justice, war and peace, or the death penalty.
All are areas where liberals are often closer to the church's view.
"Our faith does and should affect how we deal with issues,"
DeLauro said. "But we're rebelling against the idea of a one-issue
church."
If nothing else, these
Catholic Democrats will haul out into the open a discussion with
their bishops, with their fellow Catholics and with their constituents
that has been festering underground. "We were silent for too
long," DeLauro said. "And that meant you were defined
by others, not by yourselves."
House Democrats Release Historic Catholic
Statement of Principles
Expresses Commitment to Dignity of Life and Belief that Government
Has 'Moral Purpose' (released Tuesday, February 28, 2006)
WASHINGTON, D.C. - A
majority of Catholic Democrats in the U.S. House led by Congresswoman
Rosa L. DeLauro (Conn.-3) today released a statement of principles.
Signed by 55 House Democrats, the statement documents how their
faith influences them as lawmakers, making clear their commitment
to the basic principles at the heart of Catholic social teaching
and their bearing on policy - whether it is increasing access to
education for all or pressing for real health care reform, taking
seriously the decision to go to war, or reducing poverty. Above
all, the document expresses the signers' commitment to the dignity
of life and their belief that government has moral purpose.
The full text of the
statement and the complete list of signers follow.
Statement of Principles
By Fifty-Five Catholic Democrats in the
U.S. House of Representatives
As Catholic Democrats
in Congress, we are proud to be part of the living Catholic tradition
-- a tradition that promotes the common good, expresses a consistent
moral framework for life and highlights the need to provide a collective
safety net to those individuals in society who are most in need.
As legislators, in the U.S. House of Representatives, we work every
day to advance respect for life and the dignity of every human being.
We believe that government has moral purpose.
We are committed to making
real the basic principles that are at the heart of Catholic social
teaching: helping the poor and disadvantaged, protecting the most
vulnerable among us, and ensuring that all Americans of every faith
are given meaningful opportunities to share in the blessings of
this great country. That commitment is fulfilled in different ways
by legislators but includes: reducing the rising rates of poverty;
increasing access to education for all; pressing for increased access
to health care; and taking seriously the decision to go to war.
Each of these issues challenges our obligations as Catholics to
community and helping those in need.
We envision a world in
which every child belongs to a loving family and agree with the
Catholic Church about the value of human life and the undesirability
of abortion. We do not celebrate its practice. Each of us is committed
to reducing the number of unwanted pregnancies and creating an environment
with policies that encourage pregnancies to be carried to term.
We believe this includes promoting alternatives to abortion, such
as adoption, and improving access to children's healthcare and child
care, as well as policies that encourage paternal and maternal responsibility.
In all these issues,
we seek the Church's guidance and assistance but believe also in
the primacy of conscience. In recognizing the Church's role in providing
moral leadership, we acknowledge and accept the tension that comes
with being in disagreement with the Church in some areas. Yet we
believe we can speak to the fundamental issues that unite us as
Catholics and lend our voices to changing the political debate --
a debate that often fails to reflect and encompass the depth and
complexity of these issues.
As legislators, we are
charged with preserving the Constitution, which guarantees religious
freedom for all Americans. In doing so, we guarantee our right to
live our own lives as Catholics, but also foster an America with
a rich diversity of faiths. We believe the separation of church
and state allows for our faith to inform our public duties.
As Catholic
Democrats who embrace the vocation and mission of the laity as expressed
by Pope John Paul II in his Apostolic Exhortation, Christifideles
Laici, we believe that the Church is the "people
of God," called to be a moral force in the broadest sense.
We believe the Church as a community is called to be in the vanguard
of creating a more just America and world. And as such, we have
a claim on the Church's bearing as it does on ours.
Rosa L. DeLauro
David R. Obey
Wm. Lacy Clay
Hilda L. Solis
James R. Langevin
Bart Stupak
Anna Eshoo
Bill Pascrell
Betty McCollum
Gene Taylor
Raul M. Grijalva
Carolyn McCarthy
John B. Larson
Ed Pastor
Joe Baca
William Delahunt
Tim Ryan
Silvestre Reyes
Mike Thompson
Linda T. Sanchez
Charles A. Gonzalez
Xavier Becerra
Diane Watson
Michael H. Michaud
Nydia Velazquez
Jim Marshall
Frank Pallone
John T. Salazar
James P. McGovern
George Miller
Tim Holden
James L. Oberstar
Dale E. Kildee
Patrick J. Kennedy
Cynthia McKinney
James P. Moran
Michael Capuano
Richard E. Neal
Mike Doyle
Peter A. DeFazio
Maurice Hinchey
Dennis A. Cardoza
Joseph Crowley
Jim Costa
Lucille Roybal-Allard
Loretta Sanchez
Robert Brady
Marty Meehan
Grace Napolitano
Luis V. Gutierrez
Jose Serrano
Stephen Lynch
Edward J. Markey
Nancy Pelosi
Lane Evans
|